[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc

Arnt Gulbrandsen arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no
Thu Feb 16 12:19:03 PST 2012

If a reason is needed: It makes no sense, because it's not something the
maintainers care about. Small size is not -O0 is about.

You might as well compare how compressible the clang output is compared
to g++. "zip compresses clang output better than gcc, but 7z compresses
gcc output better than clang."


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list