[LLVMdev] -inline odd behavior
ryta1203 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 10 14:47:43 PST 2012
Seems like bad behavior to just decide to delete the function, no? Why not
just ignore it then and output the input?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have some code that has one function and if I use the-inline on it then
> > these opts eliminate the entire function (which is the entire file).
> > Bugpoint produces bugpoint-reduced-simplified.bc, but when I then run
> > bugpoint-reduced-simplified.bc -inline" I get nothing, file get emptied.
> > It doesn't crash or assert. I have attached a test case.
> Your function has internal linkage and no uses; therefore, your .ll
> file is equivalent to the empty .ll file.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev