[LLVMdev] -inline odd behavior

Ryan Taylor ryta1203 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 10 14:47:43 PST 2012

Seems like bad behavior to just decide to delete the function, no? Why not
just ignore it then and output the input?

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have some code that has one function and if I use the-inline on it then
> > these opts eliminate the entire function (which is the entire file).
> >
> > Bugpoint produces bugpoint-reduced-simplified.bc, but when I then run
> "opt
> > bugpoint-reduced-simplified.bc -inline" I get nothing, file get emptied.
> >
> > It doesn't crash or assert. I have attached a test case.
> Your function has internal linkage and no uses; therefore, your .ll
> file is equivalent to the empty .ll file.
> -Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120210/a71ee887/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list