[LLVMdev] max/min intrinsics
nrotem at apple.com
Mon Dec 17 11:20:08 PST 2012
Maybe we can have two versions of the intrinsic function, "ordered" and "unordered", just like fcmp has . Would that work ?
 - http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fcmp-instruction
On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:14 AM, "Schoedel, Kevin P" <kevin.p.schoedel at intel.com> wrote:
> At Monday, December 17, 2012 2:05 PM, Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] wrote:
>> This part worries me. The new min/max intrinsics will only be useful if we could pattern match cmp/select into them.
> Yes, that's the obvious alternative. I don't think we have any strong opinion either way, and fcmp/select is certainly easier to implement.
> Kevin Schoedel, Software Developer, Intel of Canada
> <kevin.p.schoedel at intel.com> +1 (519) 772-2580
More information about the llvm-dev