[LLVMdev] is anyone using the sparc backend?
mailing-list at martin-whitaker.me.uk
Tue Oct 25 01:01:56 PDT 2011
Dan Gohman wrote:
> I'm removing old targets that no longer appear actively maintained,
> to reduce the burden for target-independent codegen maintenance.
> Does anyone object to the removal of the Sparc backend?
I have an interest in the SPARC backend (and contributed a patch to improve it
a few months ago, although I don't think the patch ever got applied). Other
projects have got in the way, but I still intend to come back to this.
More information about the llvm-dev