[LLVMdev] Typo in IsLegalToCallImmediateAddr?
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 21 05:42:44 PDT 2011
2011/10/21 David Meyer <pdox at google.com>> Rafael,
> I believe MachO can't represent this relocation, even in non-PIC mode.
> On my Mac, I tried compiling "call 256". I got:
I think PIC is just the default (the kernel being non-PIC for
example), but I am not sure.
> in section __TEXT,__text reloc 0: R_ABS reloc but no absolute symbol
> at target address
> I believe the correct thing to do is:
> isTargetELF() && TM.getRelocationModel() == Reloc::Static
> This will do the right thing on ELF, and the right thing on other
> formats. This may have been the original intent.
Could be, echristo, bigcheese, would this be correct for Mach-O and COFF?
> - pdox
More information about the llvm-dev