[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
wendling at apple.com
Fri Oct 21 01:44:47 PDT 2011
Not yet. That is, I don't think any have been filed at all for 3.0. I don't know whether to be happy or worried. :-) Any that are regressions should be marked with the 'regression' keyword and be a release blocker.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> Do we have a list of which PRs have been filed that are considered release blockers?
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Testing for LLVM 3.0 release candidate 1 is now under way! We will soon have binaries available for you to download and try. Those who would like to compile things and try them out for themselves can grab the source tarballs here:
>> A Word About Patches
>> I neglected to send out instructions on how to get patches into the LLVM 3.0 branch. All patches must be approved by the code owners (http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#owners). Please CC me on all emails for patches you want in. I may not catch them otherwise.
>> Code owners, please be stringent about which patches you accept. Please approve only those patches that are critical for the release. I'm no longer accepting new features into 3.0. I will accept patches for features which were turned on before the 3.0 branch, if they are absolutely necessary and have gone through at least one nightly test run on ToT.
>> Share and enjoy!
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev