[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
adasgupt at codeaurora.org
Mon Oct 17 06:45:48 PDT 2011
> Maybe we could have a BoF session during the conference on the 18^th
> to come up with a basic set of release criteria for ARM targets?
I had submitted a BoF proposal to discuss correctness testing and
performance tracking processes for LLVM. While the agenda for the BoF is
more general than just ARM, we could discuss the release criteria for
ARM targets as part of that BoF.
*From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
*On Behalf Of *Kristof Beyls
*Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2011 6:31 AM
*To:* 'Tanya Lattner'; rajav at codeaurora.org
*Cc:* James Molloy; 'Joe Abbey'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
*Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
I agree with the remarks made by Tanya.
Our team plans to actively help fix release blocker bugs for ARM targets.
However, clear release criteria need to be defined for that, so that
it's clear which bugs are release blockers. Additionally, continuous
testing needs to be set up to automatically determine whether there are
any release blocker bugs or not.
Maybe we could have a BoF session during the conference on the 18^th of
November to come up with a basic set of release criteria for ARM targets?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev