[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen

Jakob Stoklund Olesen stoklund at 2pi.dk
Tue Oct 11 12:54:20 PDT 2011

On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:38 AM, David A. Greene wrote:

> FYI, the way I am implementing for loops means that they *could* work in
> multiple places (e.g. multiclasses) but they do not have to be used that
> way.  Restricting for loops to only the top level actually complicates
> things slightly because it becomes a special case.
> I'd like to continue this implementation but of course I would not
> actually try to use them in multiclasses or anywhere else besides the
> top level.  Actually, I don't plan to use them at all anytime soon, but
> it sounds like Che-Liang has some immediate needs.
> Does this sound reasonable to you?

Yes, thanks for working on this.

> I'll still wait until the 3.0 split to check anything in.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list