[LLVMdev] Turning on/off instruction extensions
pbarrio at die.upm.es
Tue Nov 29 08:21:56 PST 2011
Ok you convinced me, I'll switch to 3.0 as soon as it comes out. This vectorizer seems like the kind of thing I'm looking for.
On 29/11/2011, at 16:39, James Molloy wrote:
> There are a *lot* of changes (around 15000 commits if I recall Chris'
> keynote) between 2.9 and 3.0/trunk. It does sound like you're on a lost
> cause at the moment - you can't ignore those patching errors.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
> Behalf Of Pablo Barrio
> Sent: 29 November 2011 15:29
> To: Hal Finkel
> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Turning on/off instruction extensions
> Sorry, the previous mail was unreadable:
> On 28/11/2011, at 18:52, Hal Finkel wrote:
>> First, grab the trunk versions of llvm and clang. This is detailed on
>> Then you apply the patch. On a Unix-like system, this is something like:
>> cd llvm
>> patch -p1 < /path/to/the-patch-file.diff
> I tried to apply the patch to llvm 2.9 (not the trunk) but it shows a lot of
> "... hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ...". Is it safe to ignore these
> errors? Is it impossible to apply this patch to LLVM 2.9? Do you have a
> version of the vectorizer patch compatible with LLVM and Clang 2.9?
> Right now I cannot switch to the trunk version.
> Thanks in advance,
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev