[LLVMdev] Contributing new backend to LLVM

[Sandeep Patel]

It would probably also help to add some systems added to the buildbot
master to test on your actual hardware.

deep

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tony Linthicum <tlinth at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Thanks, Eric and Eli.  We will do that, and will add some tests to
> include with our submission.
>
> We are also in the process of getting our simulator and C library (both
> proprietary) released under a new license so that folks can download
> them and actually run programs.  That's a couple of months away, though,
> and doesn't really help much for creating LLVM regression tests.  Still,
> it will make reproducing problems easier. :)
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 11/1/2011 2:22 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 1, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Sergei Larin wrote:
>>
>>> Eli,
>>>
>>>   We can probably think of something like that, but diff on assembly output
>>> is prone to false negatives and depends on the machine independent part of
>>> the compiler...
>>
>> Please look at how all of the existing tests in test/CodeGen/<Target>  work
>> before rejecting the suggestion.
>>
>> -eric
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>