[LLVMdev] description of llvm::Value correct?

Jochen Wilhelmy j.wilhelmy at arcor.de
Sun Mar 6 07:18:58 PST 2011


Hi!

in the detailed description of llvm::Value it says:

All _types_ can have a name and they should belong to some Module

Is this correct or is it rather

All _values_ can have a name and they should belong to some Module?

Is it correct to use types across modules (in the same context)?

-Jochen





More information about the llvm-dev mailing list