[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 85, Issue 50

Peter Lawrence peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jul 28 16:41:16 PDT 2011

            I have been using the first official release llvm-2.9  
tarball and a clang from very shortly after that,
built for my PowerPC-Apple-Darwin,

I am a bit surprised that this would have changed since then, but  
pleasantly surprised nevertheless.

Peter Lawrence.

On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John McCall wrote:

> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote:
>> John,
>>           I'm still not sure what you're talking about, I have  
>> included the assembly
>> output from two compilations, one with a user explicit catch-all,  
>> one with only an
>> implicit cleanup, the DWARF Action Table and Types Table are  
>> absolutely identical,
>> as are the indexes used to reference the Action Table from the  
>> region maps.
> What compiler are you talking about, and on what platform?
> The results I'm seeing clearly have both gcc and clang on Darwin  
> generating
> different LSDAs for your cleanup examples and your catch-all examples.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110728/86139808/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list