[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 85, Issue 50
peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jul 28 16:41:16 PDT 2011
I have been using the first official release llvm-2.9
tarball and a clang from very shortly after that,
built for my PowerPC-Apple-Darwin,
I am a bit surprised that this would have changed since then, but
pleasantly surprised nevertheless.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:49 PM, John McCall wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote:
>> I'm still not sure what you're talking about, I have
>> included the assembly
>> output from two compilations, one with a user explicit catch-all,
>> one with only an
>> implicit cleanup, the DWARF Action Table and Types Table are
>> absolutely identical,
>> as are the indexes used to reference the Action Table from the
>> region maps.
> What compiler are you talking about, and on what platform?
> The results I'm seeing clearly have both gcc and clang on Darwin
> different LSDAs for your cleanup examples and your catch-all examples.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev