[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
reid.kleckner at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 18:36:47 PDT 2011
He wants to be able to resume execution from the debugger after
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alistair Lynn <arplynn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yep, but tripping the debugger is highly non-portable.
> You're suggesting that inline asm is more portable than calling abort?
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev