[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM

Talin viridia at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 11:12:23 PDT 2011

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:56 AM, FlyLanguage <flylanguage at gmail.com> wrote:

>    #define ASSERT_STRM(cond, args) \
>>     if (!(cond)) AssertionFailureStream(__FILE_**_, __LINE__) << args
>> Note that there's no trailing semicolon, as this is supplied at the
>> point where the macro is invoked.
>> What do you think?
> Neat, but inducing a debug trap is even more useful on asserts
> (optionally).

What's the best way to do that? I'd like to incorporate it into my
frontend's diagnostics.

-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110726/8309df13/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list