[LLVMdev] Missed optimization with indirectbr terminator

Carlo Alberto Ferraris cafxx at strayorange.com
Thu Jul 7 04:33:26 PDT 2011

Il 07/07/2011 11:14, Cameron Zwarich ha scritto:
> I haven't read the code in detail, but it looks like JumpThreading at 
> least attempts to thread across indirect branches. You can either try 
> to fix it or file a bug with your test case.
In the source it says "If the predecessor is an indirect goto, we can't 
split the edge. 
Why would that be the case?
Carlo Alberto Ferraris <cafxx at strayorange.com 
<mailto:cafxx at strayorange.com>>
website/blog <http://cafxx.strayorange.com> - +39 333 7643 235
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110707/ccae877a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cafxx.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 233 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110707/ccae877a/attachment.vcf>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list