[LLVMdev] DIFactory

[Talin]

Sorry, I meant DIBuilder.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn't know DIFactory existed until you mentioned it just now.
>
> And if folks are adding brand new classes to LLVM, can we not follow the
> naming conventions in the developer guidelines?
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote:
>
>> Seems the last use of DIFactory in LLVM/Clang is in:
>>
>> clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp to get the enums
>> llvm::DIFactory::OpDeref and llvm::DIFactory::OpPlus.
>>
>> Shouldn't this be moved to DIBuilder and remove the dependency completely?
>>
>> --
>> cheers,
>> --renato
>>
>> http://systemcall.org/
>>
>> Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
>> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Talin
>



-- 
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110218/7b0fbe36/attachment.html>