[LLVMdev] finding integer undefined behaviors using clang
regehr at cs.utah.edu
Tue Apr 12 12:45:34 PDT 2011
Thanks Nick-- this all sounds great!
> it looks like that's never used, only the clang::NoIntegerCheckAttr is
> needed. Any reason to keep the llvm attribute around?
I doubt it, but will double check with Peng.
> Is there a repository with this code that I can hack on? Or what should I do
> from here?
I'm not sure what's the best way to open up this patch for hacking, but am
open to suggestions.
More information about the llvm-dev