[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?

[Eli Friedman]

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's a suggestion - can we make the "union patch" (the inverse of the
> patch that removed unions) as a downloadable file so that people who are
> interested in finishing the work can do so?

Anyone who's really interested in working on it can just use "svn diff
-c 112356", and apply it with "patch -R".

-Eli