[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?

Borja Ferrer borja.ferav at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 11:21:19 PDT 2010


I've noticed this pattern happening with other operators aswell, but used
xor in this example. As i said before, i tried with different register
allocation orders, but it will produce always the same result. GCC is
emitting longer code, but since LLVM is so nearer to the optimal code
sequence i wanted to reach it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100904/ab1c47bd/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list