[LLVMdev] LTO, plugins and binary sizes

Diego Novillo dnovillo at google.com
Wed Oct 13 08:46:32 PDT 2010


On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 00:17, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> wrote:

> Last time I tried gcc could not build itself with LTO, so I am not all
> that excited to try it :-)

Yeah, LTO support in 4.5 is fairly brittle.  You want to use 4.6
(trunk, currently) for LTO-based bootstraps.


Diego.



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list