[LLVMdev] LLVM maintainers, code reviews

[Bjorn Reese]

On 2010-11-10 12:58, Renato Golin wrote:

> In a nutshell, the design decisions should be communicated more
> effectively, and a Wiki is a great place to start. Peer reviewers
> should communicate via the Wiki, so patchers could learn and plan
> before the next iteration and reduce the cost for everybody.

You may consider using a review tool rather than (or in addition to)
llvm-commit. For instance:

   http://www.reviewboard.org/

With this tool you can assign review responsibility of certain parts of
the code to different reviewers, so if somebody submits a patch of some
source code files, the responsible reviewers will automatically get a
review request in their inbox.