[LLVMdev] Void values

me22 me22.ca at gmail.com
Sat Jun 12 10:28:19 PDT 2010

On 12 June 2010 04:23, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Not having a void type also means that people writing front-ends for C-like
> languages won't try to convert "void*" into a pointer to the LLVM void type
> and be confused when it doesn't work :)

It might even mean that they use {}* for void*, instead of overloading
the meaning of i8*, which would be nice.

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list