[LLVMdev] Void values
pwalton at mozilla.com
Fri Jun 11 15:43:01 PDT 2010
I'm interested in adding support for void values (i.e. unit types) to
LLVM. Currently, "void" is only allowed as the return value of a
function, and numerous assertions are in place to check this.
This document  that Google pulled up seems to suggest that this idea
> Finally, one annoying, but trivial, nuance of the LLVM type-system is
> the 'void' type, which is only currently allowed as the return value
> of a function. Special cases like this should be eliminated.
Is this still the case, and if so, is there any work being done on this
More information about the llvm-dev