[LLVMdev] fp Question

[Reza Yazdani]

                                  Estimated                       Estimated
                Base     Base       Base        Peak     Peak       Peak
Benchmarks      Ref.   Run Time     Ratio       Ref.   Run Time     Ratio
-------------- ------  ---------  ---------    ------  ---------  ---------
410.bwaves                                         --    0.0194
RE
416.gamess                                         --    0.00135
RE
433.milc                                               --
16.5                 -- S
434.zeusmp                                         --    0.00146
RE
435.gromacs                                        --    0.00138
RE
436.cactusADM                                   --    0.00135            RE
437.leslie3d                                         --
0.00141            RE
444.namd                                             --
19.4                  -- S
447.dealII                                             --   19.7
-- S
450.soplex                                         --    0.0380          --
S
453.povray                                         --    2.49            --
S
454.calculix                                       --    0.00135
RE
459.GemsFDTD                                       --    0.00150
RE
465.tonto                                          --    2.40            --
S
470.lbm                                            --    6.52            --
S
481.wrf                                            --    0.00140
RE
482.sphinx3                                        --    3.19            --
S

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17
>> of  floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in
>> my build?
>>
>
> Hi Reza.  Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's normal.
>  You may have checked out the source at a moment when it had a bug in it;
> that unfortunately happens frequently.  Which ones are failing?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100723/c2ed8a14/attachment.html>