[LLVMdev] Union type, is it really used or necessary?

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Tue Jul 20 08:34:42 PDT 2010

On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:

>> used to make the code manipulating the union type "well typed". This
>> approach seems work very well, is there really a need to keep union type in
>> LLVM?
> I think in its current state the unions should be removed from LLVM IR
> in next release. It's pretty much unfinished and noone is willing to
> work on them.

I agree.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list