[LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?

Renato Golin rengolin at systemcall.org
Wed Jul 14 01:51:49 PDT 2010


On 13 July 2010 17:54, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Thanks for catching this.
> Fixed r108246.

Most welcome. ;)

Btw, the 2.6 debug information (referred from the blog) doesn't warn
users that it's deprecated, nor it links to the new info (in an
obvious manner, at least), that is completely different. That happens
with the release notes that haven't been released yet, I think it
should be the same for all deprecated/yet-to-be-released documents.

A header will suffice, a watermark would be nice. ;)


cheers,
--renato

http://systemcall.org/

Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list