[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison
regehr at cs.utah.edu
Wed Jan 20 12:05:52 PST 2010
> I started looking through the llvm-gcc vs. clang comparisons, and
> noticed that in
> , size_t is declared incorrectly. Any idea how that might have
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll look into this tonight.
However I can give you the quick generic answer right now (of course you
already know it) which is that real C code does just about anything that
can be parsed :).
If LLVM warns about this incorrect definition I can eliminate this kind of
test case, I'll look into this as well.
More information about the llvm-dev