[LLVMdev] ocaml survey

Erick Tryzelaar idadesub at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Feb 18 23:35:38 PST 2010

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>> 3. Are there any llvm functionality that you need exposed to ocaml?
> Nope. The only feature I'd like is exceptions on the OCaml side from LLVM
> errors.

What errors? We won't be able to catch asserts, but perhaps there are
other errors we could detect?

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list