[LLVMdev] Buildbot

David Greene dag at cray.com
Wed Feb 17 09:44:34 PST 2010

On Monday 15 February 2010 20:46:52 Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> > BTW, how sure are we that all these are gcc issues and not some incorrect
> > code somewhere that triggers undefined behavior?
> Medium sure? :)
> I spent a little while hunting this particular bug, and it acted very
> much like a compiler bug. I never narrowed it down to a test case,
> though.

Is there a gcc bug for this testcase?  I'd like to understand better exactly 
what the issue is.

Looking at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc here's the 
current recommendation:

   We routinely use GCC 3.3.3, 3.4.0, and Apple 4.0.1 successfully with them 
  (however, see important notes below).

Is this really still true?  Is there a later version of gcc that's 
recommended?  3.4.x is ancient.  Does the page need an update?

What are people out there using today?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list