dag at cray.com
Fri Feb 12 07:23:33 PST 2010
On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:40:09 Chris Lattner wrote:
> > I would really rather not have to specify the entirely redundant !0.
> > Just the fact that the instruction has metadata with index/name
> > "nontemporal" should be enough.
> Why? These are uniqued anyway, it won't matter for performance and
> "!nontermporal !0" is not substantially worse than "!nontermporal". I'd
> rather keep the metadata model simple than optimize it for nullary
It just seems wordy, but I don't have a big issue with it if it makes other
More information about the llvm-dev