[LLVMdev] "UNREACHABLE executed!" error?
sabre at nondot.org
Sun Aug 15 17:32:25 PDT 2010
Yeah, sounds good to me. I strongly support ripping them out of mainline completely.
On Aug 15, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hi, Chris
> What do you think about this?
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca>
> Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 01:34
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] "UNREACHABLE executed!" error?
> To: Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
> Cc: Alec Benzer <alecbenzer at gmail.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>>> I just noticed that my union seems to look like an array....is that actually
>>> a union or do I have a problem somewhere?
>> Yes. Unions are pretty much broken and unimplemented. They can be
>> removed pretty soon (say, after 2.8)
> We've never released with unions. Could we remove them for the 2.8
> release instead of afterwards when they're part of our forever
> forwards compatible bitcode format?
> Similar to what we did to the vfcmp and ficmp instructions maybe?
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
More information about the llvm-dev