[LLVMdev] Proposal for a new LLVM concurrency memory model
dag at cray.com
Mon Apr 26 13:05:05 PDT 2010
On Sunday 25 April 2010 21:26:47 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Chandler, Owen, and I have written up a proposal for a new memory
> model and atomic intrinsics in LLVM, which will make it possible to
> support Java and the upcoming C++0x standard. The proposed changes to
> the LangRef are at
What's a "trap" and "trap value?" Is it some C++0X or Java thing?
It needs to be defined.
>From the rationale, "trap" sounds like the IA64 trap value. That's
too target-specific for a proposal like this. Why not just say that
the use of an uninitialized value is undefined and leave it at that?
More information about the llvm-dev