[LLVMdev] [proposal] Extensible IR metadata
clattner at apple.com
Fri Sep 11 20:33:07 PDT 2009
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Dan Gohman wrote:
>> On Sep 11, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>> Devang's work on debug info prompted this, thoughts welcome:
>> The document mentions "instructions" a lot. We'll want to be able to
>> apply metadata to ConstantExprs as well at least, if not also
>> (think noalias) and other stuff, so it seems best to just talk about
>> "values" instead, and DenseMap<Value *, ...> instead of
>> DenseMap<Instruction *, ...>.
> I'm wondering that too. Can we replace LLVM function attributes with
> metadata? There's been some pushback to adding new function
> attributes in the past and it would be nice to be able to prototype
> new ones without having to change all of the vm core.
The pushback has been about adding lots of weird and special purpose
extensions, not the encoding.
More information about the llvm-dev