[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879
lattner at apple.com
Tue Sep 8 14:05:45 PDT 2009
On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
> First-- thanks to Daniel Dunbar for reporting this issue from my
>> earlier coarse report on IRC and to Devang Patel for fixing it.
>> I'm writing to request that this fix (r81058) find its way into the
>> 2.6 release. Code compiled with clang that uses VLAs is horribly
>> broken without r81058 (at least on x86-64). I don't know if it has
>> any other implications but it's definitely greatly stabilizing for
>> code base.
> Makes sense.
> Tanya, please pull http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html
> into 2.6 when convenient, thanks!
This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit
and its not causing a regression.
>> PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
>> Michael P. Lyle
>> Chief Executive Officer
>> Translattice, Inc.
>> mlyle at translattice.com
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev