[LLVMdev] 2.6 request - Bug 4879

[Tanya Lattner]

On Sep 7, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> On Sep 7, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
> First-- thanks to Daniel Dunbar for reporting this issue from my
>> earlier coarse report on IRC and to Devang Patel for fixing it.
>>
>> I'm writing to request that this fix (r81058) find its way into the
>> 2.6 release.  Code compiled with clang that uses VLAs is horribly
>> broken without r81058 (at least on x86-64).  I don't know if it has
>> any other implications but it's definitely greatly stabilizing for  
>> our
>> code base.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Tanya, please pull http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090831/086443.html 
>  into 2.6 when convenient, thanks!
>

This can not go into 2.6, because r79742 is not in 2.6:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090817/085284.html

Should this really be a release candidate? Its changing quite a bit  
and its not causing a regression.

-Tanya

>
> -Chris
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> PS -- I am not subscribed to this list.
>>
>> -- 
>> Michael P. Lyle
>> Chief Executive Officer
>> Translattice, Inc.
>> mlyle at translattice.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090908/c89ad5a3/attachment.html>