[LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?

[Kenneth Uildriks]

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
> Code that takes the default lazy behavior will still work if the
> default is changed to non-lazy.  The only way non-lazy breaks (as far
> as I know) is if you've already done some lazy JITting and left some
> lazy stubs laying around.  And code that does that will still work,
> after adjusting to an API change.

I should say that code that *avoids* leaving the lazy stubs in place
will still work.  Code that leaves them around will still break
reliably