[LLVMdev] LLVM target-independent code generator for reconfigurable logic

[Samuel Crow]

Hello Ether,

Yours isn't the first to target reconfigurable logic.  I think http://www.c-to-verilog.com/ has a good example of going from a C compiler to reconfigurable logic.  The usual way to lower to gate layout is to just lower the math operators to the equivalent use of an ALU and then optimize from there.  Unfortunately for you, you'll need a modulo scheduler to make the code compile to raw gate layout with any reasonably acceptable level of optimization.  Modulo schedulers are very processor intensive so you'll be adding minutes to the compile time and the results are only moderately good.

I hope this helps,

--Sam



----- Original Message ----
> From: ether zhhb <etherzhhb at gmail.com>
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: Tue, November 17, 2009 6:48:34 AM
> Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM target-independent code generator for reconfigurable logic
> 
> hi every one,
> 
> i am use LLVM targeting a architecture with a processor and
> reconfigurable logic around it.
> 
> now the llvm code generator work fine with the processor, but i am
> struggling to make the code generator to generate proper DAGs for the
> reconfigurable logic because  "The LLVM target-independent code
> generator is designed to support efficient and quality code generation
> for standard register-based microprocessors.", so i want to insert my
> special DAG building code to the code generator.
> 
> should i completely replace SelectionDAGISel, or modify
> SelectionDAGISel when necessary like this:
> 
> LowerArguments(BasicBlock *LLVMBB) {
> // code for traditional target
> ...........
> 
>   for (Function::arg_iterator I = F.arg_begin(), E = F.arg_end();
>        I != E; ++I, ++Idx) {
> 
>        if (TLI.isStrangeTarget()) {
>              //code for my strange target
>              TLI.HandleArgment(...);
>              continue;
>        }
>        // code for traditional target
>        .......
>   }
> 
>     // code for traditional target
>     .............
> 
> }
> 
> 
> thank you for any suggestion