[LLVMdev] Pass to remove unused functions
clattner at apple.com
Wed May 6 11:27:41 PDT 2009
On May 6, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
> Yeah, I found that out, which is why I was hoping some kind of
> attribute existed that the compiler knew about.
> We might go the path of modifying llvm-link to only link in
> functions that are required as that seems to be the most optimal way
> of doing it.
If you care about performance, then you should consider a completely
different approach. It is really inefficient to load a large volume
of code and then delete it as dead. I strongly recommend watching
Nate's talk at the last llvm developer meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev