[LLVMdev] Suggestions for improvements to the GC docs.

Jon Harrop jon at ffconsultancy.com
Thu Mar 5 18:46:42 PST 2009


On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:01:43 Talin wrote:
> ...the 'derived' pointer...

The docs and LLVM GC API currently assume that GC references are just a single 
pointer. That is overly restrictive and, indeed, cannot even express the GC 
that I just wrote. I would like to see that generalized.

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list