[LLVMdev] Adding safe-point code generation
gordonhenriksen at me.com
Tue Jun 23 06:59:04 PDT 2009
On 2009-06-23, at 07:18, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> Actually, this distinction between safe points for inserting code
> and safe points for frame maps is probably is a critical design
> issue for your use case. Our current definition of a safe point is
> at the return address of a call instruction, which is precisely
> what's required to call the stack. This is NOT the location where
> you want to add a call to your runtime.
“... precisely what's required to walk the stack ...”, rather.
More information about the llvm-dev