[LLVMdev] ML types in LLVM

[Wesley W. Terpstra]

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> Is this really a problem for MLton?  I think you only get less precise
> alias analysis, and that's it.

Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance
and the native x86 codegen. If I don't give LLVM the same information
the x86 codegen has, it's an unfair comparison.