[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison

Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu.org
Thu Dec 17 11:53:54 PST 2009

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 19:54, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore.com> wrote:
>> However I would prefer to leave these testcases in, unless there is a
>> strong feeling that they are too distracting.  They serve as poignant
>> little reminders about how easy it is to get volatile wrong...
> They skew the results in favor of the less careful compilers so they are more
> than simply distracting, they are unfair.

Yes, that was my point.  If you want to make a separate section for volatile,
that would indeed be helpful.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list