[LLVMdev] Please fix the buildbots.

[Daniel Dunbar]

There is a timeout parameter available to the ShellCommand step.

 - Daniel

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:10 AM, rohit.verma <rohit170309 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am executing some test cases on one of the slave and got the following
> output on stdio screen.
>
> "command timed out: 1200 seconds without output"
>
> Some of my test cases executes for (~1 hr) and won't display any output on
> stdio screen.
>
> So is there anyway to increase the timeout value to  1 hour or so.
>
> PC details are as follows:
> Linux Box(2.6.29) with buildbot version 0.7.11.p2.
>
> Please help me in regarding this issue
>
> Regards,
> Rohit
>
>
> Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
>>> Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just received this:
>>>>
>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>  http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229
>>>>
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/
>>>>
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: nick1
>>>>
>>>> Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 84759
>>>> Blamelist: ofv
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>>>>
>>>> Apparently the problem was a warning at configure time that is
>>>> interpreted as a failure by the buildbot.
>>>>
>>>> The mentioned svn revision is a change on docs/CMake.html which,
>>>> obviously, does not affect the build at all. On the past I received
>>>> multiple similar bogus messages.
>>>>
>>>> While the buildbots spit such nonsense it is reasonable to expect people
>>>> ignoring buildbot's nag messages.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've asked Daniel Dunbar to increase the timeout on this machine. Every
>>> build which requires libLTO to be rebuilt will fail, but because it's
>>> doing
>>> an incremental build the later builds may succeed so long as libLTO
>>> doesn't
>>> change. It's flapping pretty nastily because of that.
>>>
>>> So Daniel, please take this as a reminder to *really* increase the
>>> timeout
>>> instead of just filing it away into your todo list :)
>>
>> Sure, sure, blame me not all the people making LLVM fatter (err, maybe
>> that is also me)! :)
>>
>> Timeout upped to 30m, let me know if you see this problem again.
>>
>>  - Daniel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Please-fix-the-buildbots.-tp25996742p26812591.html
> Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>