[LLVMdev] updated code size comparison

Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu.org
Wed Dec 16 01:26:14 PST 2009

On 12/16/2009 03:21 AM, John Regehr wrote:
> Hopefully the results are more fair and useful now.  Again, feedback is
> appreciated.

I would also avoid testcases using volatile.  Smaller code on these 
testcases is often a sign of miscompilation rather than optimization. 
For example, 
http://embed.cs.utah.edu/embarrassing/src_harvested_dec_09/076389.c is 
miscompiled on GCC 3.4 and SunCC 5.10.

Sorry for not noticing yesterday.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list