[LLVMdev] Problem with code generated for call using stdcall convention
hans at hanshq.net
Thu Dec 10 00:18:22 PST 2009
I too have stumbled over this.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to add a check for this to the function
Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
>> I naively though it would pick up the call convention from the declaration
>> as there was no error like we have when the wrong number of parameters is
> This is not an error, you're just invoking undefined behaviour.
More information about the llvm-dev