[LLVMdev] r72619

Bill Wendling wendling at apple.com
Mon Dec 7 11:37:48 PST 2009

On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:

> In case anyone cares, dragonegg gets this right.  This shows that
> (as suspected) the problem is in the gcc parts of llvm-gcc rather
> than in the gimple -> IR conversion itself, since dragonegg has
> the same conversion logic as llvm-gcc.
That's not entirely surprising... :-)


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list