[LLVMdev] inlining hint

[David Greene]

On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:59, Dale Johannesen wrote:

> class X {
>     int A(int x) {....}
>     inline int B(int x);
> };
> inline int X::B(int x) {...}
>
> Per the language standard, A and B are semantically identical, both
> "inline".  It's been suggested that we should omit the inlinehint on
> A, on the grounds that many C++ programmers do not know this, and
> therefore misuse the construct.   

No, no, no!  :)  I rely on this behavior.  I assume anything I define
in the class definition will be inlined (when reasonable).  I do this for 
performance reasons.

                            -Dave