Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> writes: > David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ >> + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. You don't have the > choice in this case, just check your STL header. LOL! -- Óscar