[LLVMdev] Signals: interpreter vs. JIT

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Sun Aug 9 15:28:24 PDT 2009


On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Matt Renzelmann<mjr at cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Sam, Nick, thank you both for your reply--that was what I thought but wanted
> to check.  The JIT compiler for x86 is pretty robust.  Are you aware of any
> comprehensive list of the most "significant" functional differences between
> the interpreter and the JIT for x86, i.e. a TODO list?  grep -I todo * ?

Not that I know if. If someone wanted to pursue this a good place to
start would be getting llvm-test to work with lli with
-force-interpreter.

 - Daniel




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list