[LLVMdev] Unnecessary moves after sign-extension in 2-address target

Greg McGary greg at mcgary.org
Tue Apr 21 14:03:57 PDT 2009

Greg McGary wrote:
> Since no one responded, I'll assume that this situation doesn't ring a
> bell with anyone, so I'll need to dig deeper...

Sorry, I wrote this too soon--I just saw Dan's response.  Thanks!  I'm 
examining the coalescer now.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list