[LLVMdev] Suggestion for VM porting to LLVM
mrs at apple.com
Sat Apr 4 10:23:23 PDT 2009
On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Gabriele Farina wrote:
> Which approach do you suggest ? are there any alternatives ?
My take, do the second one first, gain some experience and have some
fun. You can use this to double check the performance and
suitability. But mid-term, I'd say, do both. This allows you to
compare the performance of each solution against the other, compile
time, compile time memory pressure, run time and run time memory
usage. You're then in a better position to decide which path suits
what usage styles you have. Long term, you can then see if it makes
sense to trim a solution out.
More information about the llvm-dev